About your Search

20140226
20140306
Search Results 0 to 23 of about 24 (some duplicates have been removed)
for me. >> since president has been in office we have reached the point where cutting the annual deficit in half to reduce the overall debt of united states by $3 trillion over the next 10 years. neil: i heard that it stuck with me i immediately said he just out to an allied made ising the debt is coming down it will shrink $3 trillion over the next 10 years? it is what. what will happen is it will grow $3 trillion less than rethought. that is a big difference. said debt will grow at 21. 3 trillion that is not the but the cbo. it is not the $3 trillion decrease but $8 trillion increase may be sheikh factors in those savings but so far that does not mean fear is less red ink. but with washington less than we feared so no need to fear. not so fast. it is a twisted way that the senator says we're making progress. because if you define progress then you must be forgetting you are digging a hole consists of a. it is time for the wake-up call the debt is getting bigger. that is like me saying i m projected to gain 50 pounds over the next decade but i am only gaining four days so i lost 10 poun
the annual deficit in half to reduce the overall debt of united states by $3 trillion over the next 10 years. neil: i heard that it stuck with me i immediately said he just out to an allied made i the debt is coming down it will shrink $3 trillion over the next 10 years? it is what. what will happen is it will grow $3 trillion less than rethought. that is a big didifference. said debwill grow at 21. 3 trillion that is not the but the cbo. it is not the $3 trillion decrease but $8 trillion increase may be sheikh factors in those savings but so far that does not mean fear is less red ink. but with washington less than we feared so no need to fear. not so fast. it is a twisted way that the senator says we're making progress. because if you define progress then you must be forgetting you are digging a hole consists of a. it is time for the wake-up call the debt is gettingg bier. that is like me sayi i m projected to gain 50 pounds over the next decade but i am only gaining four days so i lost 10 pounds. but i did not gain 40 pounds? it could have been 50 but fat chance we would die this. what do
to the flood insurance program which is 24 billion in deficit spending. will this legislation put us further into the deficit? >> no, not at all. in fact, this bill, unlike the senate version which, you know there was a lot of discussion over the senate version, this bill is actually 100% paid for, and, generates about $165 million, according to the cbo, of revenue over five years. so it pays for itself. it is not a tax because it, it pays for itself only for those within the national flood insurance program. so if you're not in a flood zone and you don't have flood insurance, this doesn't affect you. but if you are in the flood insurance program and your primary residence you will pay a user fee to pay in the program of $25 a year. very reasonable. that will pay for the program. gerri: i got it tell you, 200 million over five years? that doesn't do anything over4 billion in debt the program is already n how will we pay that off? >> well it is still better than nothing. had we done nothing, there wouldn't be 165 million toward that debt. that is number one. second thing that number is not co
that there are lots of issues that are important. let's start wwth the debt. let's start with the incredible deficit and the size of government. >> we have a tax problem and a spending problem. and it basically came to a grounding all. lou: what are you going to do about lois lerner? dirty have the attorney general in contempt. what are you going to do a former senior irs official? he's basically told you guys to buzz off. i have a bill, hr 1950 that criminalizes this action. lou: retroactively? >> the question is what are you going to do about lois lerner who has told you guys to buzz off. >> we are going to make certain that there are two aspects of the story are told. hold people accountable and find out who did this. and you move forward with the legislation that holds people accountable if it haapens again. and i think the american people are shocked at what has occurred at the irs that the administration is doing nothing and we are going to work diligently to hold these people accountable to make sure this doesn't happen again. lou: no one is a bbgger fan of darrell issa than i am. and i think
with the incredible deficit and the size of government. >> we have a tax problem and a spendi problem. and it basically came to a grounding al. lou: what are you going to do about lois lerr? dirty have the attorney general in contempt. what are you going to do a former senior irs offcial? he's basically told you guys to buzz off. i have a bill, hrr 1950 that iminalizes this action. lou: retroactively? >> the questio is what are you going to do about lois lerner who has told you guys to buzz off. >> we are going to make certain that there are two aspects of the story are told. hold people accountable and find out who did this. and you move forward with the legislation that holds people accountable if it haapens again. and i think the american people are shocked at what has occurred at the irs that the administration is doing nothing and we are going to work diligentlto hold these people accountable to make re this doesn't happen again. lou: no one is a bbgger fan of darrell issa than i am. and i think you know that. you and your committee have done brilliant work. i do think that you r
it will increase the deficit $6.2 trillion. if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. let's not go there. insure the uninsured. no. the ceo says the 75 million will still be uninsured. finally, brea. we talked about approval. forget all that. the american public doesn't want it. 92% want to change this or appeal it. we have a law that has absolutely no benefits the puic doesn't want. we are living with it. i can't understand it. >> well, david, maybe you can help us understand it. why do you think 50% of the uninsured want no part of this? >> well, it's a toll that's based on news they may hear or stories they may hear. to the extent some of those stories are misleading. you have julie bunstra from michigan who did an ad for a congressman running for the senate saying her premiums were going up. it turns out her premium on the affordable care act exchange went to 357 from $1,100 from before or benny in spokane in the state of the union response lamenting how she is now paying a premium of $700,000. guess what, we come to find out she did not go on the exchange and only got a policy shot
. and it is a driver of our deficit. it is a huge driver. >> you are riding a pyre in a crowded movie theater now. maybe there are ways to cut back on certain areas of the military. but, however, on the back, we have to go. the thought of a military man having to pay more for his health care when we are flipping over backwards to make sure pajama boy gets his free obamacare, this sin sanity? >> it is insanity. it is a disgrace. we should be treating our military better and should keep that in mind when president obama claims to be caring about the military when they are balancing the budget and do the entitlement programs in the system off of the back door military person well we will have to leave it will. thank you very much. you can keep the conversation going on twitter. >>> the obacare surcharge that may have you doing this the next timeou get yr restaurant bill. closer look to the receipt the next time you dine out. getting slapped with a 1% affordable caring act surcharge. first it was a restaurant in l.a. and now a strant chain in florida. obamacare surchargesre going coast to coast, folk
have large budget deficits, when we move out to 2018, baby boomers begin to retire if great numbees. lou: why are the republicans having a hard time remembering that it is about reducing will left of spending here? why is that difficult in that document that he put out there, in my opinion, could have come from the obama white house. >> mm-hmm, that is -- how do you curb spending overtime, that is politically unpopular there is the problem. when you talk about changing tax code, people are not go many are not going to are having happy, if they lose tax deductibility of for municipal bonds. lou: i think this document will reside to the sidelines, at the very best. lou: there is really no escaping retal. >> hunl demands to be made of federal government not too many years from now. lou: john lonski thank you, we appreciate it. >> new reports city nationwide are doing away with red light cameras. among concerns about the red lights, what they really amount to, their worth. their invasiveness, what they increase traffic accidents. usage of these cameras has fallen. by 6% since 2012. 7 st
, it would be about $660 billion. and that just covers today's deficit. >> everyone contribute to social security and everyone will take advantage of it when they hit and all the glh in the thinking of medicare. >> what we faced up to animal entitlement by letting people opt out? >> would you consider opting out of the whole system under one condition? donath the government for anything. >> we got a standing ovation. so what is wrong with that? >> i take care of myself and. >> we are doing a real-time experiment over the past couple of decades. we have been seeing the 401k programs that have been meant to type about retirement security. >> people suffer. john: this man was fired after working 35 years for the city. he had hoped to relax and travel. now at age 66, he is a security guard at the local mall. >> we put our money in every payday. >> i think that is very important as to why there should be federal programs. they're going to come and go with the economy. it used to be an industrial powerhouse. >> politicians are either good or responsible. >> i think it will have this. >> even t
. that just covers today's deficit does not touch the $30 trillion unfunded liability. >> it is the tention of the people. everody can take advantage same thing with medicare. john: what if we phase out the unsustainable entitlements letting the young people opt out? from paul propose that. >> would you consider opting out of the whole system under on condition that you pay 10 percent of your income but you take care of yourself and dn't ask the government for anything. heers and applause] john: he got a standing ovation. >> that is the liberty to star in the streets as an elderly person? >> i am responsible for myself. >> we're doing real-time experiment you can see the for a 1k programs they have been pretty much a ilure. there is a lot of the tax breaks that go to the rich. john: people have been since they can control. >> they are not saving even enough bically and it is difficult for people to save that way. peoplsuffer. a bunch of towns have already gone bankrupt one was prpritchard alabama. john: recently retired from the fire department after working 35 years. he hoped to relax and
president has been in office we have reached the point where cutting the annual deficit in half to reduce the overall debt of united states by $3 trillion over the next 10 years. neil: i heard that it stuck with me i immediately said he just out to an allied made ising the debt is coming down it will shrink
has pron he took a deficit nowt i a surplus, rating agents have given us better marks. i tnk he is making progress in terms of environment and other issu. i question whether we need to devide the state to 6 pieces, but even if weid. the u.s. senate would have to apove the admission of 10 new senators. in to their body, diluting their power. why does senator fro nevada or alabama or ohio want to giv california 10 more senators? neil: his logic does make sense, at leastase level, thats that it is a very big state. unwieldy state,n so far as interests and you know even physical concts are very desperate throughout the state, i don't know that means you have to have 6 different states, butt makes it disfunctional. what do you make of that argument and why the 6 pieces? >>'t know why the 6 pieces we have n and south carolina, and north and south dakota, two states is possie, that was tried 1 in late 1850s, but. there is no way on earth that the u.s.ongress is going to dilute itsower and give more power to california. as you know they hate athing big, wre the bigge state, we tend to
the days of roman empire. its budget deficit is more than a billion dollars. that is the problem. local officials are pleading for a bailout. the country has other problems. the unemployment rate is highest ever, 13%. landing in south korea where the pastor of the world's largest church has been convicted embezzling $12 million. come on. his megachurch congregation top as million worshipers. each church has rows of atm machines in the hallway. that was dead give away something afoot. he has been given a three-year suspended prison sentence and will mead to pay $5 million in fines. >>> do you ever have too much money? i don't think so. don king doesn't. we'll ask him during the break. we'll be right back. in the new new york, we don't back down. we only know one direction: up so we're up early. up late. thinking up game-changing ideas, like this: dozens of tax free zones across new yk state. move here. expand here. or start a new business here... and pay no tax for 10 years. with new jobs, new opportunities and a new tax free plan. there's only one way for your business to go. up. find o
the nucleus to correct from deficits for tell burterrible illnesses to pt blindness in the third person providing that healthy dna. all the characteristics of what may be a person of than an illness are conveyed by the biological parents. i don't have a problem with that. if all you are donating is the healthy environment in which the traits that belong to two biological parents are to grow, that seems okay to me. stuart: it will be taking a bit further, won't it? you are getting designer babies. >> now allow anonymous and oregon donation. it deprives the offspring of knowing their biological parents. will not even consider this. donate or over him. so is a kid doesn't know who the dad or mom is. what o you need to know that for? it is the key to who you are spiritually, medically. stuart: i am with you all the way. i'm not sure i see a way of banning it and stopping it when it gets to that kind of situation. how do you stop that? i'm going to touch on one of your favorite subjects. social media apps. you are not a fan of social media, but in this case social media is organizing tyrus.
would happen with the $17 trillion deficit? stuart: we have asked you this before. what are we going to do? you told us you are out there, we want to bring people together. not looking for a radical opposite to what is going on. you want to bring people together to find solutions and i know you have been out there looking. do you think it is possible to establish a consensus? is it possible to bring people together over a course of action that will take us in a different direction in the future? >> it is very possible. we need to start talking. never have a conversation with your adversary because that humanizes them and your job is to demonize the. we see a lot of that going on. that is not what we want. in the pre revolutionary days of america people need to get together with their friends and family and talk about what kind of america do you want to have? talk about who your representatives are and how did they vote. not how they said they voted but how did they vote. you need to know that because you need to talk to your 87-year-old and who hasn't voted in 20 years who may be an
off its deficits. charles: everybody saying marijuana is this thing like smoking cigarettes with no negative impact to it. there is a negative impact. >> we wish somebody in d.c. just as blunt about health care incentivizing to play the ppano while somebody subsidizes them to leave their job. charles: you can't make this stuff up, exporting goods is suing the ceo of what else for allegedly pretending to be a senior executive, he told the store manager he had a meeting with the ceo and persuaded the employees to show him around in the private back areas and answer questions about the operations. is that balls he or what? >> is this true? a secret agent man pretending he is an employee? charles: a senior executive. >> i think it is a right if it is true, it is a little bit over the top. charles: it is embarrassing to say this guy walked in and anyone could have done that. >> they should give him a coupon, think it is funny. charles: ukraine is spooking the market. your take is next. ♪ see what's new at projectluna.com >> the russians need american technology to develop their
Search Results 0 to 23 of about 24 (some duplicates have been removed)